Author Archive

 

At Aerisa we are constantly asked what is the difference between Ions and Ozone and how does your systems clean the air and improve overall indoor air quality? In this post we hope to explain what Ions and Ozone are and how they work.

Introductory definitions:

Ozone is a chemical that contains three oxygen atoms, one more than the oxygen that we breathe.  Ozone is a neutral molecule (one without any overall charge).

An atom is a basic unit of matter containing a nucleus (containing protons and neutrons), surrounded by electrons.

Protons are positively charged; neutrons are neutral; and electrons are negatively charged.

A molecule is a group of two or more atoms held together by covalent bond(s), which is when atoms share electrons.  Generally molecules, by definition, are neutral.

An ion is an atom or molecule that has either a positive or a negative charge.

A charge is created when the total number of electrons is not equal to the total number of protons, such that there is a net difference of charge.

Only electrons can transfer from an atom or molecule, the number of protons and neutrons is fixed (except for radioactive decay).  Individual atoms within one molecule share electrons in order to balance the charges and create a neutral molecule, such as ozone, water, dioxygen, or molecular nitrogen.  Dioxygen and molecular nitrogen make up the majority of the air we breathe.

 

An ion can consist of a single atom, such as monatomic oxygen with a single negative charge; or, it can consist of multiple atoms, such as an oxygen molecule that has attracted an extra electron, or a nitrogen molecule that has lost an electron.

Charged objects are attracted to objects with the opposite charge, positive to negative and vice versa; conversely, they are repelled by objects with the same charge.  This is illustrated by the attraction and repellant forces observed with magnets.  A charged object can also attract something that is neutral, such as a charged balloon to a neutral wall.

These charge characteristics also are the force that allows current (electrons) to flow through conductive materials in order to generate electricity.  The shock one feels from static electricity starts with the build-up of a charge on two surfaces (shoes and carpet) that are then separated (and thus contain opposite charges).  The shock occurs when the built-up charge comes into contact with a second (oppositely) charged or conductive surface.  This contact allows the charge to neutralize by flowing excess electrons from one surface to another and creates a shock as the discharge occurs.

Ions, Ozone and Aerisa

Ions typically exist at a much lower concentration than ozone in normal air.  Aerisa technologies produce ions through the use of electricity, high voltage, dielectrics (non-conductive material), and conductive materials.  A byproduct of this technology can be ozone.  Even with Aerisa increasing the density of ions in the air a hundred-fold, ions still exist at a relatively low concentration when compared to ozone and other contaminants.  The charged nature of ions allows them to be much more effective than ozone at the expected concentrations produced by Aerisa technology.  This effectiveness is due to the different behaviors of ions and ozone, specifically, their different reaction mechanisms (or how they interact and react with other molecules) and reaction speeds.

The effectiveness of ions is due to the uniqueness of gas-phase ion reactions.  In gas-phase reactions, an ion’s charge cannot be destroyed (except for collisions with an oppositely charged ion) because charge must be conserved.  The charge can be transferred but not destroyed.

Notice the positive charge  transfers, but does not disappear.  The same would occur for a negatively charged ion.

Thus, an ion can participate in a reaction and survive in a modified form to participate in another reaction.  In such a manner, an ion (or rather the ion’s charge) can participate in thousands of reactions, and each reaction can be up to 1 million times faster than ozone.

Ozone, by contrast, works through chemical reactions, and is more reactive than oxygen.  Because ozone is not a charged molecule, when ozone reacts with a contaminant in the air, it goes through a reaction that produces different molecules that are not typically charged.  These products are usually more stable than ozone, and may be able to react with another molecule if the conditions are right.  Because there is no charge to conserve, an ozone molecule can only generate 1 up to 5 gas-phase reactions, and thus is used up much more quickly than ions.  While ozone is not a charged molecule, it is polar, meaning that the electrons are shared unequally which creates a charge on one side and an opposite charge on another side.  This polarity allows ozone to react easily with other molecules.  Ozone will decay back to the more stable form of dioxygen.

Ions do not behave the same when they come into contact with a surface.  In this case, the charge can be ‘absorbed’ by the surface; whereby the solid properties of the surface cause the charge to either be transferred through the solid and out to ground or it may charge the surface slightly if it is a less conductive material.  When the surface is charged, it will eventually find a mode to disperse and become neutralized.  Due to the absorption and neutralization of the charge by the surface, ions are able to react once and are done.  Ozone is depleted similarly when contact is made with a surface.

Ions in gas-phase reactions also can attract particles (both oppositely charged and neutral) in the air together through their charges.  This allows the particles to become heavier / larger in size and cause them to drop out of the air and either be cleaned through normal housekeeping duties, or get filtered out through return air system filters.

Ions are very effective in improving indoor air quality through removal of dust particles from the air stream, and by breaking down odors and contaminants into less offensive molecules.

May
05

When does a Smell

Posted by: Mark Allen Roberts | Comments (1)

Is “dilution the solution to pollution”? Really?

Ok, I admit it I am new to the odor remediation industry, the Indoor Air Quality industry and by no means am I a civil engineer or an HVAC expert. However ever since I started helping clients with nuisance odors I keep hearing a common quote;

Dilution the solution to pollution”

Have you ever heard something that everyone has been saying for years that made you wonder….really? Well this quote this basic premise weaves its way through a number of odor treatment and nuisance odor remedies that impact indoor air quality today ( IAQ) . So I started asking around and doing a little web based research.

What I found was during the WWII time period and the United States was experiencing explosive industrial growth, the thought; The Solution to pollution is dilution was the de facto standard. This though that has become a belief by being repeated for over 72 years now permeates throughout applications designed to solve nuisance odor remediation today.

How do we solve an odor, say from a Volatile Organic Compound, impacting the indoor air quality? ….we pump in more air from the outside ambient air,… after all it has to be cleaner than the inside air right? Not so says the EPA reports that discuss the six most common air pollution concentrations for ozone, particle pollution, NO2, CO2 and SO2.So this makes me scratch my head…so let me get this straight, the way you will remove say the nuisance odor of diesel fumes at an indoor bus station is to pump more outside air, from where the buses are continually idling all day? And what about the air with fuel smells impacting your indoor air quality…where does it go with your recommended 12-20 air changes per hour? You guessed it, it is released into our outside ambient air. (Where you are gathering the supposed clean air to ventilate the indoor air space)

I did find an interesting comment from Smart Communities Network;

The maxim “dilution is the solution to pollution” was the conceptual tool applied to air pollution for most of the 20th Century. By diluting airborne toxins with sufficient fresh air, the theory goes, their concentration and toxicity can be reduced to the point that they pose no threat to human health or to the environment. It has become clear in this era of global air pollution and climatic change that the dilution theory has its limitations. To reduce air pollution to a level that is sustainable, new strategies must be developed.”

Ok, so this is where I need industry experts in the HVAC industry, say someone familiar with Ashrae Standards to help add their expertise to the conversation.

Is dilution the best solution to indoor air pollution impacting the overall indoor air quality?

Is dilution perhaps a great solution for some agents in the air and not VOC’s?

What is the energy cost impact of a dilution / ventilation strategy?

April 22, 2011
Categories : dilution, indoor air quality, pollution, Uncategorized
Comments (2)

 

 

 

 

“let’s clean the air?”…about air quality

Our team at Aerisa is launching this blog to discuss issues that impact air quality, indoor air quality ( IAQ) and we plan to discuss innovative new products, the science of new technologies,  as well as tried and true products that have been around for many years.

We plan to interview market leaders and call upon leaders in the scientific community to answer air quality issues. Our goal is to become a resource of information, a venue for discussion,  and to share new innovative products that  provide clean breathable air.

Some of the questions we plan to address include; 

Is Hydrogen Sulfide, (H2S) the leading cause of odor complaints at waste water treatment plants?

 

How can HVAC distributors maximize their profits by solving indoor air quality problems?

 

Do you have to produce Ozone when providing ionized air technology (IAT)?

 

What is Ozone?

 

What is “cold plasma” technology and how is it being used?

 

What is an Odor?

 

What does the EPA define as a Nuisance odor?

 

At what point does an odor become a “nuisance odor”?

 

What are the positives and negatives of carbon scrubbers to clean the air?

 

How can air purification systems clean the air of mold spores, black mold?

 

What is the definition of “Indoor Air Quality”?

 

Does ionization create ozone?

 

Can nuisance odors as a by product of manufacturing be prevented? (As well as their corresponding fines)

 

What is “sick building syndrome” and how can we protect ourselves, or workers?

 

Do mecaptans create more nuisance odor complaints than H2S?

 

How can you mitigate nuisance food court odors?

 

What are the leading threats in indoor air quality today?

 

What are the various kinds of odors and how can they be removed?

 

How are industry leaders reducing CO2 in the air?

 

What is a bio filter and how does it work?

 

How can you control pet odors?

 

What are the latest products for air quality sensing and odor diagnostics?

 

Is “dilution the solution to pollution”? Really?

 

What is a chemical scrubber?

 

Is there a correlation between poor indoor air quality due to cigarette smoke and consumer spending at casinos and other gaming facilities?

 

What are some of the biggest challenges facing the facility manager of today with regards to indoor air quality?

 

What are some innovative green technologies to provide the maximum indoor air quality?

 

Does “perfuming the air” in casinos really improve indoor air quality?

 

How many indoor air exchanges are required to provide the maximum indoor air quality?

 

Can good smells become a nuisance?

 

There are many other questions we have discovered working in our markets and our goal is to “clean the air”. If what people assume is true, or if the scientific data proves they are myths, we plan to discuss them. We are counting on this to be a venue to discuss the science of clean air and debunk myths as well as share new innovative products to serve the air quality industry.

Mark Allen Roberts